The Crown Court

I am the judge, and it is my job to interpret and uphold the law. Other people present during a trial at the Crown Court are the prosecution barrister and the defence barrister, usually with solicitors behind them taking notes, and the Jury. The defendant will sit in the dock and be present during the trial. It is at my discretion whether or not there is a public gallery. After the jury has been sworn in, I address them directly. I inform them it is for them to decide, if the evidence they are going to hear proves the defendant’s guilt. I also inform them that it is their job to consider the evidence, not the law, and that I will guide them if necessary on points of law. I am the next person to address the jury. I introduce myself and explain that I will appear on behalf of the prosecution in this case and my learned friend, who I name, appears on behalf of the defense. I then outline the prosecution case, explaining each offence and the evidence the jury will hear in proving this. I will state that it is the prosecution’s responsibility to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the offence that they are before the court for. I will introduce the first prosecution witness. I will then ask a series of questions with regards to the evidence they have given in a statement to the police. This is known as examination in chief. Upon completion of this, the defence may ask the witness a series of questions. This is known as cross-examination. Upon completion of the cross examination I may be given the opportunity to ask a further series of question the witness. This is known as re-examination. I will continue to call witnesses until all the witnesses have been called to the stand. I will announce to the court that this is the case for the prosecution. At this point in the case I may make an application of no case to answer to the judge stating that the prosecution has not raised sufficient evidence to prove that the defendant has committed the alleged offence. If he finds in favour of my application, he will instruct the jury to find the defendant not guilty and then he will release the defendant. This is an acquittal. If the Judge considers the prosecution has raised enough evidence then I will continue with my case. As with the prosecution barrister, I will introduce the witnesses, however, at this time they will be giving evidence for the defence. This will follow the same procedure of examination in chief, cross-examination and then re-examination. At the end I will declare that was the case of the defence. I then stand and give what is called my closing speech where I outline the prosecution case and try to persuade the jury the defendant is in fact guilty. I then stand and give my closing speech, outlining the defence’s case and try to persuade the jury that the defendant is not guilty. I will then sum up all the evidence. I will direct the jury on the legal issues and what the prosecution has to prove if they are to find the defendant guilty. I will give them the legal options available, reminding them that if they are not sure they must find the defendant not guilty. We then retire to make our decision. Once a decision has been reached we return and as foreperson of the jury I announce the jury’s verdict. If found not guilty, the defendant is released. If the defendant is found guilty I will make a statement in mitigation to the judge, the judge will take this statement into account before sentencing. I thank the jury for the service that they have provided. If the defendant is found not guilty, I will release the jury from the court. If the defendant is found guilty, I will move to sentence him in a straightforward case. It is likely in that instance that the jury will remain in court. I may however postpone sentencing where other factors are to be considered. This can be particularly appropriate where there have been contentious issues or where the defendant’s background is likely to have a significant impact on the sentence I pass.

100 Responses

  1. Jane Daly says:

    Sum up

  2. Jane Daly says:


  3. Jane Daly says:

    If you watched it

  4. Robert Lembo says:

    but the wigs though…

  5. Jane Daly says:

    At 12 i met a celebrity a real one

  6. Jane Daly says:

    I got compensation and it got robbed

  7. Jane Daly says:


  8. victoria Lea says:

    Phoenix wright ace attorney helps me become a defense attorney.

  9. Jane Daly says:

    Pablo is alive

  10. :Cam Truth ! says:

    Corrupted to the core ! legalese ,dog Latin ect !

  11. the radiant red diamond says:

    Is it policy to wear wigs or is it optional

  12. Doza says:

    I came to know about the WIGS man… tell us about the dang wigs!

  13. Steve McIlroy says:

    I wish this could have been my court against my lying ex wife. In my case the three magistrates and my ex wife should have been given lethal injections and the death penalty. She was exposed for lying under oath which the court clerk ignored. The court clerk would not allow me a Mckenzie Friend, not allow me to read my opening statement or produce evidence from a bank my ex wife was lying under oath, then when I put in a complaint about the court clerk, she lied to her own dept saying she would have given me all the above, then they charge me. Great legal system we live in, its not fit for purpose. To avoid all the lies, all they have to do is record ALL court hearings, that way people will get a fair trial, simple. I'd pay a reasonable sum of money to have this as an option, I would never have been charged.

  14. Jane Daly says:

    I am in

  15. Jane Daly says:

    Now let me out

  16. Jane Daly says:

    Now let me in

  17. Jane Daly says:


  18. Jane Daly says:

    Inform me

  19. Jane Daly says:

    Befor me

  20. Jane Daly says:

    Befor us

  21. Jane Daly says:

    Section a

  22. Jane Daly says:


  23. Jane Daly says:


  24. Jane Daly says:


  25. Jane Daly says:

    No levels

  26. Jane Daly says:


  27. Jane Daly says:


  28. Jane Daly says:

    At the end

  29. Jane Daly says:

    Closing levels

  30. Jane Daly says:


  31. Jane Daly says:

    Highlight me

  32. Jane Daly says:


  33. Jane Daly says:


  34. Jane Daly says:


  35. Jane Daly says:


  36. Jane Daly says:


  37. Jane Daly says:


  38. Jane Daly says:


  39. Jane Daly says:


  40. Jane Daly says:


  41. Jane Daly says:


  42. Jane Daly says:


  43. Jane Daly says:


  44. Jane Daly says:


  45. Jane Daly says:


  46. Jane Daly says:

    Case1 me and my codes

  47. Jane Daly says:


  48. Jane Daly says:

    Closing levels

  49. Jane Daly says:


  50. Jane Daly says:


  51. Jane Daly says:

    Remind me

  52. Jane Daly says:


  53. Jane Daly says:


  54. Jane Daly says:

    If you dont make sense we will lead

  55. Jane Daly says:


  56. Jane Daly says:

    Jury lied

  57. Jane Daly says:

    Jury hid

  58. Jane Daly says:

    The law gamed

  59. Jane Daly says:

    State the procesa

  60. Jane Daly says:


  61. Jane Daly says:


  62. Jane Daly says:


  63. Jane Daly says:


  64. Jane Daly says:


  65. Jane Daly says:


  66. Jane Daly says:

    To pretty

  67. Jane Daly says:


  68. Jane Daly says:


  69. Jane Daly says:


  70. Jane Daly says:


  71. Jane Daly says:


  72. Jane Daly says:


  73. Jane Daly says:

    Not the law of terriost

  74. Jane Daly says:


  75. Jane Daly says:


  76. Jane Daly says:

    They wanted bradleys ass hole

  77. Honey Beauty Secrets says:

    Your Honour I am not guilty but 12 people who don’t know me say I am guilty. What a foolish white wash system and what they do not tell you their questions are designed so that the jury don’t get the full picture of the case. There is no justice in this world only fat cats getting richer. The defendant should be allowed to present their case from start to finish

  78. Mercy Mbataku says:

    Very helpful, thanks

  79. Joyce Yagoda says:

    Is there an open court system in Britain? I thought the trials and punishment was for all to see, once upon a time, in the UK.

  80. Iggy Barrato says:

    Is this a real case or a mooting exercise at university? . Most courts in towns are now closed to the people especially in deprived areas.

  81. Chris Evy says:

    Very upsetting to watch people wear wigs as I was watching a movie from like 300 200 years ago our society is in serious jeopardy. Europeans have lost their minds they don’t deserve their country. Hamas knows this they will take you over through your wig wearing stupidity. Europeans are seriously a big disgrace

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *